Anxiety Prevention Dashboard Findings

 

Findings From School-Based Anxiety Prevention Research

This interactive tool presents data from studies included in our meta-analysis of school-based anxiety prevention programs.

This tool can help you compare study findings across different contexts and see which interventions had beneficial effects. 

See the full anxiety prevention report Explore all the research database

Report a problem or offer feedback about this dashboard

Recommended citation: Trevino, S. D., Bhagwat, A., Day, E., Steinka-Fry, K., Chinn, L., Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Grant, S. (2026). Findings from School-Based Anxiety Prevention Research. [Interactive Dashboard].  https://hedcoinstitute.uoregon.edu/dashboards/anxiety-prevention-research-findings

Using the tool:

Filters
  • Using the filters, you can select a variety of characteristics – location, school type, outcomes and interventions – and the table and visualizations will auto-populate all the studies that included schools or students that meet those criteria.
  • If your filters do not return any studies, researchers have not studied those populations or contexts OR simply did not report if they did.
  • Note: The total number of studies shown reflects only those included in the meta-analysis, not all studies for which we have descriptive data.
  • There were no U.S. studies that met our inclusion criteria for this review. 
Table Information
  • The Forest Plot tab shows information about each primary study that provided an effect estimate in our meta-analysis. Each row represents a standardized mean difference from a single study outcome + intervention contrast + timepoint.
    • For example, when all filters are cleared, the first column would be interpreted: For the program School-based anxiety prevention (SBAPP), immediately after the program ended, participants in the program had 0.163 standard deviation units lower anxiety symptoms compared to control group students as measured by the RCADS.
    • The standardized mean difference will display as a dot in the middle column. Hover over the dot to see more details.
      • Green dots represent a positive intervention effect, red dots represent a negative intervention effect.
      • The length of the line indicates uncertainty, and the larger the dot size, the larger the sample size.
      • Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane’s tools that were appropriate for each study design
  • Selecting the Visualizations tab will provide you with plots of descriptive summaries across studies.